Jones v Mississippi Key Vocabulary Quiz 6
[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.9.4″ _module_preset=”default”]
For each Key Vocabulary Word, decide whether the below sentences use the word accurately and correctly.
This quiz focuses on the use of express, certiorari, and mandatory and discretionary.
[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]
Quiz Summary
0 of 14 Questions completed
Questions:
Information
You have already completed the quiz before. Hence you can not start it again.
Quiz is loading…
You must sign in or sign up to start the quiz.
You must first complete the following:
Results
Results
0 of 14 Questions answered correctly
Your time:
Time has elapsed
You have reached 0 of 0 point(s), (0)
Earned Point(s): 0 of 0, (0)
0 Essay(s) Pending (Possible Point(s): 0)
Categories
- Not categorized 0%
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Current
- Review
- Answered
- Correct
- Incorrect
- Question 1 of 14
1. Question
The Mississippi Court of Appeals rejected Jones’s argument, relying on this Court’s express statement in Montgomery that “ ‘Miller did not require trial courts to make a finding of fact regarding a child’s incorrigibility.’ ”
CorrectIncorrect - Question 2 of 14
2. Question
The Mississippi Court of Appeals rejected Jones’s argument, relying on this Court’s statement in Montgomery that “ ‘Miller did not require trial courts to make a finding of fact regarding a child’s incorrigibility.’ ”
CorrectIncorrect - Question 3 of 14
3. Question
The Mississippi Court of Appeals rejected Jones’s argument, relying on this Court’s express delivery in Montgomery that “ ‘Miller did not require trial courts to make a finding of fact regarding a child’s incorrigibility.’ ”
CorrectIncorrect - Question 4 of 14
4. Question
The Mississippi Court of Appeals rejected Jones’s argument, relying on this Court’s express pronouncement in Montgomery that “ ‘Miller did not require trial courts to make a finding of fact regarding a child’s incorrigibility.’
CorrectIncorrect - Question 5 of 14
5. Question
The Mississippi Court of Appeals rejected Jones’s argument, relying on this Court’s express sentence in Montgomery that “ ‘Miller did not require trial courts to make a finding of fact regarding a child’s incorrigibility.’ ”
CorrectIncorrect - Question 6 of 14
6. Question
In light of disagreement in state and federal courts about how to interpret Miller and Montgomery, we granted certiorari.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 7 of 14
7. Question
In light of disagreement in state and federal courts about how to interpret Miller and Montgomery, we issued certiorari.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 8 of 14
8. Question
In light of disagreement in state and federal courts about how to interpret Miller and Montgomery, we gave certiorari.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 9 of 14
9. Question
In light of disagreement in state and federal courts about how to interpret Miller and Montgomery, we grant certiorari.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 10 of 14
10. Question
In light of disagreement in state and federal courts about how to interpret Miller and Montgomery, we requested certiorari.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 11 of 14
11. Question
Miller held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment prohibits mandatory life-without-parole sentences for murderers under 18, but the Court allowed discretionary life-without-parole sentences for those offenders.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 12 of 14
12. Question
Miller held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment prohibits a mandatory life-without-parole sentences for murderers under 18, but the Court allowed a discretionary life-without-parole sentences for those offenders.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 13 of 14
13. Question
Miller held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment prohibits the mandatory life-without-parole sentences for murderers under 18, but the Court allowed the discretionary life-without-parole sentences for those offenders.
CorrectIncorrect - Question 14 of 14
14. Question
Miller held that the Cruel and Unusual Punishments Clause of the Eighth Amendment prohibits mandatory life-without-parole punishments for murderers under 18, but the Court allowed discretionary life-without-parole punishments for those offenders.
CorrectIncorrect